How we score

No mystery numbers. This page explains exactly how your physique score, body-fat estimate and training plan are produced — and what a photo can and can't tell us.

Body-fat % — always a range

Photo-based body-composition estimation is validated science — studies comparing 2D-photo estimates against DEXA scans report strong agreement — but it is still an estimate. Lighting, pose and clothing move the number. That's why we always show a range, never a false-precision decimal, and why we never claim "DEXA accuracy".

Same photo, same score

Re-analysing the same photo returns the same result — scores are cached per photo, so your progress deltas reflect your body changing, not model noise. For week-to-week comparisons, our capture guide helps you match angle, distance and lighting.

Your plan — published training science

Programs are generated from the hypertrophy evidence base: weekly volume landmarks per muscle, a minimum of two sessions per muscle per week, hard sets taken 1–2 reps from failure, double progression, and scheduled deloads. Every change to your plan comes with the reason attached.

How your program is built

The research basis: volume dose-response meta-analyses and the RIR-based progression literature. We use the published consensus ranges, not one cherry-picked study.

The closed loop

Scan → program → log → re-scan → verified delta. Your scan builds the program, your logs drive the progression, and the next scan measures whether any of it worked — against your own baseline, in the same light, at the same angle.

Your rank only moves when a re-scan proves change. We can't be fooled by streaks — and neither can you.

What we don't do

← Back to saviorbody